Archive for new york mets
The Dangers of Small Sample Sizes in Sports
Posted by: | CommentsHi. I’m here to talk you off the ledge.
Yesterday, my beloved Mets had one of the ugliest major league games I’ve ever had the misfortune of watching. Tim Redding actually did a great job in his first start of the season, but the real story was the Mets committing five errors, not to mention one horrible mental blunder by Ryan Church: coming home to score the go-ahead run in the 11th inning, Church did not touch third. So after he crossed the plate, the Dodgers calmly took the ball, stepped on third, and that was the end of the inning. Church’s run did not count.

The following turn at bat for the Dodgers was almost as brutal, as Angel Pagan in left didn’t get out of the way when Carlos Beltran called for a fly ball, causing it to drop. Despite this, the Mets actually had a chance to get out of a bases loaded, no outs jam, but replacement first baseman Jeremy Reed threw wide at home plate to end the game.
To my fellow Mets fans, and sports fans in general when a bad game like this happens, I have one sage piece of advice: calm down.
I know, this is easy to say in a vacuum and doesn’t bring much comfort, but let me introduce you to the concept of small sample sizes.
Let’s say you’re playing poker: you’ve got pocket Aces, you raise, a guy behind you goes all in. You get giddy and call, and he turns over 75 suited. Now you’re even more giddy, he was on a straight bluff! Flop has a 7, so you’re a little more worried. Thankfully, nothing comes on the turn, but the river is a 5. You’re out.
Now, you’ll probably stomp and curse and kick, which is entirely understandable. That guy just made a horrible play, and you got punished for it. But if you’re a high level poker player, this shouldn’t really affect you too much emotionally. In fact, the best players in the world will all generally roll with this sort of “bad beat”, and not even flinch.
Part of this is just having the good emotional discipline that’s necessary to succeed in their line of work, but the logical aspect of this is rooted in an understanding of small sample sizes. If you’re a professional poker player, you see hundreds of thousands, if not millions of hands a year. And within that massive amount of hands, what’s one bad beat? Entirely inevitable, not to mention fairly insignificant in the big picture. So why get hung up over it?
For a better illustration, let’s say you took the opposite approach. If you didn’t recognize this one hand as a very small sample size, all kinds of poor, unhelpful things would result from it. You’d be steaming all week, complaining to anyone who would listen, and it would generally make you an angry, upset person. And then what happens the next time you’re in that seat, have pocket Aces, and someone re-raises you? Are you going to fold because last week your Aces got cracked? Of course not. Not to sound like the Dalai Lama here, but you need to have the emotional understanding that there’s no need to get upset about one isolated incident in the big picture.
As a sports fan, I implore you to take a similar approach. When you focus on one play, one error or one loss and extrapolate larger meaning from that, it’ll bring you nothing but unwarranted emotional stress. Not to mention that on a logical level, it can cause you to come to some foolish conclusions. For example, on ESPN’s Sunday Night Baseball, Steve Phillips mentioned how Carlos Beltran didn’t slide home a few weeks ago on a key play, and used that to conclude that Beltran is a player who makes tons of mental mistakes. The internet went crazy the following day, as evidence piled on to show how wrong Phillips was. In turn, he’s probably lost a great deal of credibility with his audience moving forward.
What I’m trying to say is, if a player on your team drops a pop-up, he’s not automatically the worst fielder on your team. If Johan Santana walks the pitcher, does he have the worst control of anyone you’ve seen? If David Wright strikes out with the bases loaded, is he suddenly not “clutch”? And this applies to positives as well as negatives. Just because Derek Jeter once dove headfirst into the stands for a ball does not automatically make him the best fielding shortstop of all time. If you hit nine home runs in the first thirteen games of the season, you’re not automatically the next Babe Ruth. Small sample sizes should not be used to draw long term conclusions.

So just as many baseball players wisely note that you need to keep a level head through the highs and lows of a long season, we should try to do the same as fans. It’s honestly hard to come up with many scenarios more brutal than last night’s loss to the Dodgers, but at the end of the day, it’s one loss. One. And yes, we can extrapolate meaning in regards to say, the short term defensive configuration due to recent injuries and how it needs to be fixed, but beyond that, there’s no sense in feeling like the team is destined for failure because of one bad game.
There’s a good chance the Mets will win tomorrow. If they don’t, I’m sure the media and some fans will think the sky is falling. If they win, and say, win a second game in a row the day after that, I’m sure many will do the opposite and feel they’re destined for the World Series. And both sides would be wrong.
Popularity: unranked [?]
Where Will Jake Peavy Go?
Posted by: | CommentsThe economy’s influence is being felt everywhere, and baseball is no exception. For large market teams like the Yankees, Mets, Red Sox and Cubs, the impact isn’t quite as big: after all, many of these teams have their own television networks for starters, not to mention a larger pool of fans to draw revenue from. Here in San Diego, things are a bit different. Attendance marks are reaching historic lows for Petco Park this season, which speaks to the quality of the team as much as the economy.

No single move signaled this change more than San Diego icon Trevor Hoffman’s departure to Milwaukee in the winter. I can tell you firsthand that no matter how badly the Padres were playing, people still came to games hoping to hear Hell’s Bells and see Trevor come in to notch yet another save on his Hall of Fame resume. San Diego didn’t put forth a huge effort to sign him, and while it was sad to see him go, Trevor’s hissy fit during his last free agent contract in 2005 prepared both the fans and Padres management for this scenario (Trevor, insulted by the offer at the time, reportedly went to the clubhouse and made a scene by cleaning out his locker).

Similarly, Khalil Greene’s salary was dumped on the Cardinals. Brian Giles however, was retained: faced with the option of buying him out for $3 million or picking him up for 2009 at $9 million, the team decided it was worth the $6 million difference to have a veteran presence on the team (and we’d assume they’ll look to trade him at the deadline). Giles has no-trade provisions in his contract, however, so he may opt to stay in his hometown and finish the season in a relaxed environment (as opposed to the pressure of a pennant chase and playoff run in a major market).
Even though the economy will be blamed, I’ll give the Padres credit on this: they just weren’t going to contend this year, so why spend the money on aging veterans? Better to restock and reload than try to win with a squad that had its moments, but just isn’t going to get it done in 2009. Or 2010, for that matter. Sure, it may irritate casual fans to see the team not spending money on improving this year, but in the long run, this is the way to go.
Which brings us to Jake Peavy. Cy Young award winner, and an elite pitcher over the last five years. He’s also 28 years old and owed $52 million from 2010-2012. When you consider that it’ll probably be a few years until the Padres are contenders again, it makes sense to trade Peavy, which achieves two goals for the team: get back top young prospects who can help make a future Padres team better, while freeing up salary to do the same. And although Peavy is a top pitcher, clearly one of the best, his effectiveness lies in his fastball. As he gets up there in age, the velocity will naturally decline. So the time to trade him is now.
Assuming his slow start gets evened out (and there’s no reason to think otherwise), Peavy is likely to be the catch of the trade deadline. As teams gear up for the playoffs, being able to put another ace in your pocket can make the difference between going home early (sorry Cubs fans), or raising a championship banner.
Here’s a look at the teams most likely to be in on this summer’s Peavy sweepstakes. Keep in mind that to even consider this move, a team needs to be in a position to make the playoffs (with one exception, see below), needs to have quality prospects to offer back to the Padres, and has to be able to take on payroll.
It’s also critical to note that most trade deadline deals like this one are typically a “rental”, as a player goes from a losing team to a contender, right before heading to free agency. Carlos Beltran with the Astros in 2004 and CC Sabathia with the Brewers last year are two good recent examples of this. The team that gets Peavy will be able to hold onto him for much longer, making the investment, particularly when it comes to prospects, easier to handle.
One more factor to consider? Peavy has a no-trade clause, so he’ll need to personally approve a deal before it happens.
Chicago Cubs: Peavy nearly went to the Cubs this winter; in fact, for a few days it practically seemed like a done deal. But both teams were in the process of being sold, making such a contract hard to move at the time. The Cubs are an aging team with a closing window of opportunity (one that has really already started to close; see Derrek Lee’s decline and Aramis Ramirez’s injury for starters), so the Peavy deal still makes sense. If Rich Harden can stay healthy and effective, and if Big Carlos Zambrano can avoid decline (pitching 200+ IP in five straight years before you turn 27 can do that to you), Peavy would be a nice addition.
A lot of “ifs” in there, and while it would be in the Cubs best interest to act, you can’t help but wonder if they’re still the best match now that the season is underway.
Los Angeles Dodgers: Thanks to a certain, recent 50 game suspension, the Dodgers now have an extra $7 million or so at their disposal. Having room for Peavy would be the ultimate way to make lemonade out of lemons. Behind rising star and young ace Chad Billingsley, the Dodgers have the reliable, if unspectacular Randy Wolf. Beyond that, Clayton Kershaw, who at age 21 probably needs some more experience to harness his talent. And then minor league guys like James McDonald and Eric Stults (who may end up being solid contributors), coupled with injured veterans like Hiroki Kuroda and Jason Schmidt.

A move for Peavy would stabilize the rotation, and gear up the team for a run at the playoffs, when they’ll also have their controversial slugger back in the fold.
New York Yankees: If we’re talking about a team looking to dump salary, you have to imagine the Yankees will at least take a look. Granted, they fortified the rotation with Sabathia and Burnett this off-season, but Wang looks lost, Pettitte is looking older, and many fans are eager to see Joba stabilize the bullpen. Trading for Peavy would all but guarantee the latter, not to mention giving the Yankees one of the more impressive rotations in the league for years to come.

The only issue would be whether or not Brian Cashman is willing to trade his prospects, something he wasn’t willing to do a few years ago when Johan Santana was available. And would Peavy want to move to the American League, not to mention New York? Considering how the new stadium has played so far, Peavy might not want to deal with the anti-Petco on the east coast.
New York Mets: The Mets have the prospects to pull off such a deal, not to mention the need in their rotation. With Oliver Perez (and his $36 million contract) in pitching purgatory, the Mets have John Maine, Mike Pelfrey and Livan Hernandez behind the spectacular Johan Santana. Not the most stable or reliable group of starters. It’s a great fit for Peavy, but by most accounts, the Mets have reached their payroll limit. Otherwise, they would have made a bigger play for Manny Ramirez or Orlando Hudson this winter.
Things may have changed by this summer, with the Mets’ need for pitching stronger, and Delgado/Wagner’s contracts coming off the books in 2010. Omar Minaya has a track record of pulling off deals when the Mets weren’t even considered (see the trade for Putz as setup man soon after they traded for K-Rod to close), so don’t be surprised if he does it again. Also, in contrast to the Yanks’ new stadium, CitiField is playing like an east coast version of Petco so far.
Milwaukee Brewers: They did it last year with Sabathia, and might do it again this year with Peavy. Wouldn’t that be something, a Peavy/Hoffman reunion at Miller Park? The Brewers are typically not the kind of team to spend lots of money, but by most accounts they offered Sabathia a 5 year, $100 million contract to retain his services this past winter. Not enough to outbid the Yankees or the larger market teams in California, but it does show that they have the need for an ace, and are willing to spend money to get one.
If Yovanni Gallardo stays healthy, and the Brewers continue to play well, you have to consider them in the mix here. The Brewers also have a cast of strong position players to offer, both in the minors and on the major league squad, who have solid potential but are often miscast defensively. The Padres would be happy to obtain some of them, and put them into roles where they can prosper.
Washington Nationals: Am I crazy? Perhaps. But the Nationals’ biggest issue right now is pitching. Slot Strasburg behind Peavy, put John Lannan into the #3 slot, and suddenly you have a serious rotation. The Nationals have also shown they have money and are willing to spend it: they were in on Mark Teixeira until the Yankees finally outbid them, and threw $20 million at Adam Dunn soon after, certainly for reasons other than contending this year. Such a move would not be for this season, but between this move and some smart decisions in the winter, they could suddenly become contenders in the competitive NL East for 2010.

Los Angeles Angels: After losing out on retaining Teixeira’s services (sensing a trend here?), the Angels surprised most by going after Sabathia next. Given that their pitching is strong, and the offense is what needs some help, this was looked at as an odd move. If the Angels still have this philosophy, and would prefer another ace over a bat, you have to think they’ll be sending some scouts down I-5 to take a look at Peavy. Presumably, Peavy wouldn’t mind staying in Southern California either.
Teams that probably won’t be involved, and why:
Atlanta Braves: Being an Alabama native, Peavy made it known that he’d approve a trade to the Braves the first time this trade carousel went around. But given their lack of offense and mediocre start, unless they can made up ground against the Phillies, Mets and Marlins, it’s doubful Peavy will want to go from one losing team to another.
Houston Astros: Another preferred team close to Peavy’s hometown, but they’re in even worse shape than the Braves these days. Not likely to happen, especially if the Astros wisely wake up, and start rebuilding for the future themselves.
Texas Rangers: Yes, they’re contending now, desperately need pitching, and they’re a team in the South. But no pitcher in his right mind would choose to pitch half his games in Arlington, a place where home runs are plentiful, and pitching careers go to die.
Kansas City Royals: Ownership has made a commitment to raise payroll, and long suffering Royals fans would be energized by a Greinke/Peavy 1-2 punch that would be the envy of the league. However, if the Royals are still contending at the deadline, their priority should be offense, and more offense. The rotation is not their issue.
And finally, one team that could go either way…
Boston Red Sox: Ever dangerous in the trade market, the Sox always seem to have prospects and payroll available to take advantage of a situation when it presents itself. However, in this case, conventional wisdom says their pitching depth is too great for them to contemplate adding Peavy to the fold. Aside from proven pitchers like Lester, Beckett, Matsuzaka and Wakefield, they have kids with potential in Masterson and Buchholz. Throw into the mix low risk, high reward veterans in Brad Penny and John Smoltz, and it becomes clear that the Sox practically have enough pitching depth for two teams this year.
However, Theo Epstein is very savvy, and pounces on an opportunity when he sees it. Case and point, his pursuit of Mark Teixeira this past winter. The Sox certainly didn’t have an outstanding need for the switch-hitting slugger, with Youkilis at first. But, they saw the situation as an opportunity to improve long-term, planning to shift Youk to third, leaving Mike Lowell the odd man out, presumably to be traded.
So, even though the Sox have less of a need for Peavy than practically any other team in the league this year, they may jump at the opportunity to do so anyway (especially if Lester and Beckett continue to underperform).

Being only a week or so into May, a lot can change between now and the trade deadline. Teams that look like buyers now might become sellers, aces can get injured, and so on. But something we can more or less guarantee is that Peavy will be heading out of San Diego, and will change the complexion of a division race and the playoffs. Given that his contract keeps him under control for a while, the prospect package San Diego gets in return should be hefty, helping them gear up for the next solid Padres squad. And with Peavy’s no-trade clause thrown into the mix, plenty of drama should result before a deal is made.
Popularity: unranked [?]
Patience With Young Pitching, Part 1
Posted by: | CommentsIn 1984, Doc Gooden was called up to the Mets’ big league team, and quickly established himself as a dominant pitcher. At age 19, he led the National League in WHIP and strikeouts, a remarkable feat. He followed this at age 20 with a 1985 season that is almost too stunning to believe: a 24-4 record, sixteen complete games, 276.2 innings pitched, 268 strikeouts, with a 1.53 ERA, and a 0.965 WHIP. Wow.

Doc would continue to be a very good pitcher, but age 20 was the peak of his career. He actually had 16 years in the majors, with his potential for greatness admittedly stifled by drug use.
And while his story serves as an example of what bad decisions can do to a career, they also lay out a bit of a blueprint as it relates to young pitchers in general:
1. Pitchers like Doc Gooden who come up at a young age and dominate out the gate are an absolute exception.
2. Even if they can accomplish this from the very start of their careers, sustained, consistent dominance at this level is incredibly rare. Even Doc couldn’t do it.
Which brings us to Phil Hughes. Long touted as the gem of the Yankees farm system, the fact that Brian Cashman never moved Hughes for an established veteran (despite many opportunities to do so) signaled a change in the philosophy of the organization, perhaps more than any other single example. And Hughes kept rolling along, dominating at every level he pitched. Sub 2.00 ERAs were the norm for him in A ball, and at AA, he continued to blow away the competition with a a 2.25 ERA and 0.91 WHIP in 116 innings. All at the age of 20. The expectations of Yankees fans went sky high, as they looked forward to the day that this kid would bring that talent to the Bronx and continue his domination.
That moment came 2007 at age 21, and he had a 4.46 ERA in 72.2 innings. Those who expected Hughes to come out and produce the same results from the start (especially considering the hype) were highly disappointed. Of course, the numbers he put up in his first season were more than adequate for a player of his age in the AL East, but most Yankees fans couldn’t help but feel a bit let down.
Regardless, expectations were high in 2008, when the Yankees trusted Hughes and Ian Kennedy with spots in the rotation. The results just weren’t there, and Hughes was sent back down to the minors before April was over. Once the prized jewel of the Yankees system, Hughes garnered far less attention after “failing” in his rotation spot. It took until September for Hughes to come back up to the Yankees, where he finally showed more ability, including a great game against the Blue Jays where he went eight innings, giving up only two runs.
And yesterday, after Wang’s horrible start to the season provided an opportunity, Hughes came up and pitched six scoreless innings. To many fans, it probably seems like he’s “finally” reaching his potential. At age 23.

The moral of the story here is that no matter how highly touted a prospect is, patience is a virtue. Especially with a pitcher. Hardly anyone has the ability to come up and replicate their minor league success from day one, much less sustain it. As fans, it helps for us to keep this in mind, especially when the hype is so huge. Hughes’ story is still far from over of course, but if he does falter again, it’ll help to remember history.
In Part 2, we’ll look at other young pitchers in similar situations as Hughes: high expectations, coupled with signs of success and some faltering. Joba Chamberlain, Hughes’ counterpart in Yankee pitching prospect hype, definitely fits into this category. So do “King” Felix Hernandez, Zack Greinke, and no-hitter-turned 6.75 ERA and demotion in Clay Buchholz.
What other current pitchers fit this mold of “Incredible young talent who didn’t meet expectations out the gate, but will get there?” Post a suggestion in the comments section, and I may include your choice in Part 2.
Popularity: unranked [?]
Reflections on Jackie Robinson Day
Posted by: | CommentsUpper Deck Blog has only been running for about a week now, but as soon as we launched, I made sure to mentally circle April 15th. I doubt I can do this day justice, but I’ll try my best.
Today marks the 62nd anniversary of Jackie Robinson taking his spot at first base at Ebbets Field on April 15th, 1947, shattering baseball’s color barrier. Sixteen years before Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, Jackie pushed the sport and our country forward, far ahead of his time.

Looking at Mr. Robinson’s history, it’s amazing that someone could achieve so much good in so little time. We only had him with us for 53 years, but he accomplished a great deal in so many aspects of his life (most removed from the baseball diamond). His most famous quote, “A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives” is inspirational, and at least from my perspective, slightly intimidating. The concept of your life having no meaning unless you influence other people for the better is a hard one to wrap your brain around, for sure.
It’s easy to almost dismiss outright, but then you remember that the man who said it:
- Grew up in a poor family.
- Was the first athlete in UCLA history to letter in four sports: baseball, basketball, football and track.
- Entered the military only to be court marshaled for refusing to move to the back of an Army bus.
- Broke the color barrier in baseball, on a deal with Branch Rickey that for the first three years, he would have to absorb all insults and threats thrown his way, without reacting angrily.
- Absorbed insults from players and fans alike, along with death threats. Despite this, he managed to still perform on the field at the highest level, while keeping his cool and not retaliating.
- Became the first black commentator on ABC’s Major League Baseball Game of the Week.
- Became the first black player to be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame.
- Became the first black person to be Vice President of a major American corporation.
- Founded the Jackie Robinson Construction Company to build housing for families with low incomes.
Once you look at all these accomplishments and the impact they had on others, Mr. Robinson’s famous quote suddenly carries more meaning. “A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives” serves as both a proverb and a challenge, with Jackie’s example leading the way for inspiration. My personal favorite Jackie Robinson moment is Game 2 of the 1972 World Series, where he was honored for the 25th Anniversary of breaking the color barrier. Rather than take the moment to bask in his own glory, Mr. Robinson expressed his wish to see a black manager in Major League Baseball. He would die but ten days later, but his wish would come true in 1975, when Frank Robinson became the manager of the Cleveland Indians.
Before this starts to sound too much like a middle school history report, I’ll point out that Jackie Robinson was good at baseball. Damn good. It’s often overlooked, given his other social accomplishments, but the guy could play. Stories of how he could control the pace of a game just by his presence on the basepaths are legendary; the pitcher would get distracted, Jackie would steal second, third, even home with equal parts precision and raw athletic ability.
Mr. Robinson won a Rookie of the Year award, an MVP award, was a six-time All Star, and won a World Series with the beloved 1955 Brooklyn Dodgers. He had a lifetime batting average of .311, with an on base percentage of .409, both phenomenal stats for his career. Consider that he only came to the majors at age 28, and you can only wonder what else he would have accomplished had he been let in earlier. Then again, it was his impact that allowed others to follow in his footsteps, having full, complete careers thanks to his efforts. It was too late for the likes of Josh Gibson or Satchel Paige (who did get to finally play in the majors at age 42, sadly we missed many prime years of his talent), but Jackie ensured future players would have that opportunity.
Fast forward to the modern era, and Jackie Robinson’s #42 is retired across all of Major League Baseball. Every park you go to, from Dodger Stadium to CitiField (and everywhere in between), players cannot wear his number, in tribute (Mariano Rivera is the one active exception, as his 42 was grandfathered in).
Today, all players will wear 42 to celebrate Jackie’s memory. A lot has been said about this issue, as players, sportswriters and fans alike wonder if having everyone wear it cheapens the significance. From my own personal point of view, I can say that despite being a huge Jackie Robinson fan (in case you couldn’t tell), I won’t wear a replica Dodgers 42 jersey. Can’t do it. I feel the weight and significance of what that symbolizes is too much to bear, and that it takes a special person who has “earned” the right to don that number. On a personal level, it feels like something sacred.

If it was up to me, I’d ask each team to pick one player or coach who they feel has earned the right to have the honor of wearing Jackie’s number on this day. That being said, I don’t think it’s something to get too hung up on. Today means far more than the numbers being worn by the players, and if a kid asks, “Why are all the players wearing 42 today?”, it serves a great reminder that leads to nothing but good and inspiration for the next generation.

On the subject of carrying on Mr. Robinson’s legacy, the Jackie Robinson Rotunda was dedicated at the new CitiField today. Jackie’s widow Rachel Robinson, Governor Paterson, and Senator Schumer were among those in attendance. The Rotunda will be the first part of the stadium you walk through before getting to the field itself, and is a fantastic tribute to Jackie and his life. I think of how important that “first baseball game” memory is for any child in America, and now for millions of kids, it’ll be, “I walked through the Jackie Robinson Rotunda and learned about who he was, and what he did.” I don’t mind telling you, I can’t get enough of the picture above, showing this unfolding before our eyes. On a personal level, I know it’ll be a reminder of the more important things in life, before and after each game I attend back home.


Popularity: 1% [?]
Why I Hate the Yankees: A Met Fan’s Manifesto
Posted by: | CommentsWe have some VERY cool things lined up for the blog starting on Monday, so before they get rolling, I wanted to tie up a bit of a loose end in regards to my Sabathia post from earlier in the week. Being a Mets fan who dislikes the Yankees, inevitably, I’m always asked to explain this attitude by my fellow Gothamites. Red Sox/Yankees hatred is easy enough to comprehend, but why would fellow New Yorkers cheer against a team that’s so iconic of our city and its history? Is it jealousy? That’s always the first assumption, but it runs a bit deeper than that.
This is the new Monument Park (and even I have to admit, they did a great job bringing it over to the new stadium). Do me a favor: click on the photo, and look at all those legendary players. Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Berra, Mantle, Maris, Donny Baseball, and so on. There’s something interesting about that list of sixteen great players though (the great Mr. Robinson removed, as his number is retired across the league). Take a moment, and see if you can figure it out. I’ll still be here.
Give up? Here’s a hint: go back, and count the number of legendary Yankee pitchers. Two. In the most storied franchise’s most storied history, only two pitchers were significant enough to be granted that honor. I should also point out that Guidry was recently added in 2003, so Whitey Ford was all alone out there for a very long time.
On the surface, this seems relatively insignificant. After all, the Yankees are known for their great hitters: guys like Ruth and Mantle whose moonshots were legendary. Which, ultimately, is my point. Since Ruth, the Yankees always have been, and always will be the Broadway feature with the marquee names. Come see the stars, watch a few go over the fence, let’s hear Sinatra sing while we make our way home.
Even the most educated, intelligent Yankee fan (my fiance is a good example of this rare creature) has to admit that there are many fans of the team who don’t pay attention to the intricacies of the game (like pitching and defense), and pay money for the biggest ticket in baseball to watch sluggers hit. Period. Big lights, big city, and everyone can understand and cheer for a home run. That’s the attraction. The stadium feels more like a mausoleum than a comfortable, warm home.
By comparison, would you like to know who our most iconic figure is? Seaver is wonderful, we all love Straw, Keith and Doc, but at the end of the day, we’re a goofy team in a big city with a history of futility. And to a man, we all love this guy:

A True Icon
Oddly enough, Colin Cowherd went on a rant regarding this very subject a few years back, on his ESPN Radio show:
Here’s what Mr. Cowherd doesn’t get, along with the majority of Yankee fans: we don’t take our team seriously, but we do take baseball seriously. Honestly, you guys are generally the opposite. Victory and adding to the championship rings is priority #1, and the rest is entirely secondary.
And to us, that’s a joyless existence when it comes to being a baseball fan. In the video above, Cowherd talks about how serious and historic the Yankees and their broadcasts are, the pomp and grandeur of it all, and how we need to be more like them. That’s kind of the point: to us, there’s no FUN in cheering for a team that has that sort of air about them. When your expectations are that high, and anything less than a World Series Championship is regarded as a failure (go ahead, ask Mr, Torre his feelings on that one), we’ll gladly take our team in Flushing, warts and all.
Admittedly, there is a generous amount of pretension in this attitude, but it comes from the right place. We moan and complain about the Seaver trade, the years of futility in the late 70s and early 80s, the wasted opportunities for what should have been more championships following 1986, Mo Vaughn and Robbie Alomar, Scott Kazmir for Victor Zambrano, Adam Wainwright throwing the perfect curveball that will haunt me in my nightmares forever as Beltran could do nothing but watch it fall for a strike and the pennant, and two of the most heartbreaking, soul crushing losses to end a season in sports history, in back-to-back years for extra sting. And we embrace having the worst season in baseball history back in 1962 (seriously, we were all very concerned when the Tigers got close to that 120 loss mark in 2003). We take all this punishment, and we keep coming back for more. Want to know why? Because deep down inside, we feel it makes us better than Yankees fans. We’ll roll with the punches, embrace our futility, and still support our team. No matter what.
By comparison, whenever anything goes wrong with the Yankees, you sense their fans are ready to jump off the bandwagon at any given moment. You should have seen the comments Yankee friends of mine back home were making on Facebook after the 0-2 start to the season. You’d swear the season was over, and you could tell they wanted nothing to do with baseball until the team started winning. To us, there’s no fun in that. I say it often, and I’ll repeat it here: if the Mets only win one more World Series in my lifetime and the Yankees win ten, that will be just fine with me. Because I’ll get more joy out of that one championship than the average Yankee fan would out of those ten combined. I’ll feel like we earned it. Yes, our payroll is gigantic too, but there’s no accounting for the emotional toll of our team’s failure and incompetence, historically speaking.
That’s what drives us: in the end, the suffering makes the success that much more meaningful. And it’s something Yankees fans will never experience, much less understand.
Next week: Thoughts on Tiger at the Masters, reflections on Jackie Robinson Day, and a sneak peek inside the Upper Deck building.
Yes, in case you were wondering, we have lots of cool stuff. I’m going to do my best to make you feel jealous.
Popularity: 1% [?]
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=50615ef8-d307-4d02-9a14-d81d204c0495)

