<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eagles Soar, Favre Returns to Lambeau</title>
	<atom:link href="http://upperdeckblog.com/2009/10/eagles-soar-favre-returns-to-lambeau/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://upperdeckblog.com/2009/10/eagles-soar-favre-returns-to-lambeau/</link>
	<description>Opinions, News and Info from Sports Industry Insiders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://upperdeckblog.com/2009/10/eagles-soar-favre-returns-to-lambeau/comment-page-1/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upperdeckblog.com/?p=2416#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>Green bay packers have to learn how to protect their q/b.You thought they learn in their first game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green bay packers have to learn how to protect their q/b.You thought they learn in their first game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://upperdeckblog.com/2009/10/eagles-soar-favre-returns-to-lambeau/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upperdeckblog.com/?p=2416#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>Ugh, for the last time, listen up rubes:

The choice the Packers had was:

1. A year or two more with an aging Favre and no QB afterwards

2. Rodgers starting a 15-year career in GB

Premier QBs are extremely difficult to come by in this league. Rodgers said he was good as gone if they let Favre come back. His contract was going to be up soon and he wasn&#039;t going to wait around another year or two.

It wasn&#039;t a matter of if Favre could play anymore - it was a choice of 2 years of quality QB play vs 15 years of it, and TT made the absolute correct choice. 

The Favre supporters don&#039;t see it now because Favre is playing still, but in 5 years when Rodgers is winning MVPs and Favre is gone, they&#039;ll be thanking TT for making the right choice in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, for the last time, listen up rubes:</p>
<p>The choice the Packers had was:</p>
<p>1. A year or two more with an aging Favre and no QB afterwards</p>
<p>2. Rodgers starting a 15-year career in GB</p>
<p>Premier QBs are extremely difficult to come by in this league. Rodgers said he was good as gone if they let Favre come back. His contract was going to be up soon and he wasn&#8217;t going to wait around another year or two.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t a matter of if Favre could play anymore &#8211; it was a choice of 2 years of quality QB play vs 15 years of it, and TT made the absolute correct choice. </p>
<p>The Favre supporters don&#8217;t see it now because Favre is playing still, but in 5 years when Rodgers is winning MVPs and Favre is gone, they&#8217;ll be thanking TT for making the right choice in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://upperdeckblog.com/2009/10/eagles-soar-favre-returns-to-lambeau/comment-page-1/#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upperdeckblog.com/?p=2416#comment-3018</guid>
		<description>Just read about your green bay match up.You are right again for green bay have to protect their Q/B. The vikings are tired after playing two physical teams, the pittsburg and the ravens. This year,any teams that play the steelers are 1-5 in the following week.Therefore, the greenbay packers wins this game easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read about your green bay match up.You are right again for green bay have to protect their Q/B. The vikings are tired after playing two physical teams, the pittsburg and the ravens. This year,any teams that play the steelers are 1-5 in the following week.Therefore, the greenbay packers wins this game easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

